| Author |
 Topic  |
|
H1ghCh4r1ty
Advanced Member
967 Posts |
Posted - 01/06/2006 : 08:33:05 AM
|
Sorry lisa, I misunderstood your post.
I am terribly dissappointed with Reilly over this issue. Obviously the girls were under the influence or the blood levels would not be an issue. Because of Reilly's interference, the police cannot move a case against the establishment or persons who served them. This is a terrible miscarriage of justice.
I wonder if he would help me if I went to him with a problem? I doubt it.
This really sickens me.
I was planning on supporting him and unless he explains himself better than what I saw on TV, I will not vote or support him.
Emile Schoeffhausen |
 |
|
|
lizbeth
Senior Member
184 Posts |
 Posted - 01/06/2006 : 08:47:06 AM
|
There's more than one reason not to vote for Tom Reilly. He's pandering to the far left with his support of illegal immigrants being able to pay in-state tuition rates at Massachusetts colleges, and he was complicit in Bernie Law's ability to escape to the Vatican by not bringing criminal charges against him -- two big red flags for someone charged as the chief law enforcement officer in the state.
|
|
|
|
sunshyne
Member
20 Posts |
Posted - 01/06/2006 : 10:00:24 AM
|
| Although I don't agree with what Tom Reilly did - I do think his heart was in the right place. The parents of those girls have suffered enough, to have it rehashed over and over again by the press isn't fair - as we all know, believe 1/2 of what you see and none of what you hear... if you were in the position the parents were in, wouldn't you use your friends to keep it quiet - not necessarily obstruct justice, which is what Reilly obviously did - he went too far. Reilly should have used his media connections to keep it quiet, not his professional/legal ones. I feel that the more everyone talks about it, the worse it will be for the poor parents of these sisters... all thanks to Tom Reilly and his misguided sense of "friendship"... |
|
|
|
EverettsPride
Advanced Member
1140 Posts |
Posted - 01/06/2006 : 6:58:30 PM
|
I disagree totally. If that girl was from Everett and had killed her sister and herself and nearly killed her good friend, and she was drunk it would have been front page news all over the state. They would have gone after the person who supplied her the alcohol and the person who let her drink in their home. What sort of a lesson was it for all of the witnesses who made statements to the police about her bringing alcohol to the party? They stated everyone was drinking. It was obviously not the young womans first time drinking since she had the sense to hide it in a water bottle. She had probably endangered lives several times before and somehow made it home safely. In rich towns like that she may have even been caught before but the cops kept it hush hush and told her parents. I feel so sorry for her parents that they lost their daughters. but I do not think less priveledged kids, living in a less affluent town would have been treated anywhere near the same way.
Sally |
|
|
|
louie
Senior Member
188 Posts |
Posted - 01/08/2006 : 08:38:31 AM
|
| bowdrigde is now the director of the rec center, along with terri colameta, john ragucci, former alderman, and ron farnell |
|
|
|
Court4Fred
Advanced Member
1201 Posts |
Posted - 01/08/2006 : 12:14:58 PM
|
| Bowdridge is a blowhard with the personality of a gas grill. That's a gift to Marchese. This should work out just lovely. And Terri and John are all getting jobs? I thought they were rec commission, not employees on staff. |
|
|
|
louie
Senior Member
188 Posts |
Posted - 01/08/2006 : 12:41:21 PM
|
| your guess is as good as mine just overheard a conversation at the bar with marchese talking to ravensi putting certain people in place, isn't terri the daughter in law of robert colameta the new building inspector |
|
|
|
lizbeth
Senior Member
184 Posts |
Posted - 01/08/2006 : 12:43:52 PM
|
| Marchese and Ravanesi are making personnel decisions? That explains a lot . . . . |
|
|
|
Court4Fred
Advanced Member
1201 Posts |
Posted - 01/08/2006 : 12:46:53 PM
|
| Marchese is talking to Ravanesi about putting certain people in place? You gotta love it. This is nothing if not proof that Hanlon is not running the city - Mike and Ravs are, along with Fred. I don't think Terri is the daughter-in-law of Mr. Colameta; she's not married. Perhaps a niece? She used to work at the Leader Herald, and is a huge Hanlon supporter. |
|
|
|
louie
Senior Member
188 Posts |
Posted - 01/08/2006 : 12:58:10 PM
|
| don't think so court this one is married not single and involved with children I realize there are 3 terri's with the last name so I guess we have to be careful don't want a lawsuit |
|
|
|
Court4Fred
Advanced Member
1201 Posts |
Posted - 01/08/2006 : 1:00:21 PM
|
| No worries, Louie. There's nothing worth suing over in any of the posts. |
|
|
|
louie
Senior Member
188 Posts |
Posted - 01/24/2006 : 06:49:33 AM
|
we saw the two men who will be running the rec center at the alderman's meeting bowdridge and farnell couldn't they find anyone younger now we have to petition our rec commission they want to demolish the skate park guess the kids will be hanging around the streets this summer. I suggest you call
terri colameta, john ragucci (alderman) allan panarese and vincent feudo to keep the skate park I know I will be doing it.
|
|
|
|
Court4Fred
Advanced Member
1201 Posts |
Posted - 01/24/2006 : 07:31:25 AM
|
| Demolish the skate park? Why would they want to do that? |
|
|
|
louie
Senior Member
188 Posts |
Posted - 01/24/2006 : 07:38:26 AM
|
| cause they don't want the kids from outside of everett hanging around please see the meeting and make phone calls. I will post phone numbers later the only one I have is john ragucci at 617-381-6767 |
|
|
|
louie
Senior Member
188 Posts |
Posted - 01/24/2006 : 08:12:43 AM
|
here are the numbers to save our skate park
terry colameta 617-381-0673, allen panarese 617-389-5297, vincent feudo 617-389-8123 I urge every parent to call to SAVE THE SKATE PARK |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
REC CENTER!!!
