| Author |
 Topic  |
|
massdee
Moderator
5299 Posts |
Posted - 04/25/2007 : 3:38:19 PM
|
| Thanks, SolidSnake. What did you think of the letter? |
 |
|
|
Ellen
Senior Member
173 Posts |
Posted - 04/25/2007 : 7:56:37 PM
|
| I hope something will be done, this man should no longer be in charge of our schools. The kids deserve someone who they can look up to, not a criminal. |
|
|
|
EverettsPride
Advanced Member
1140 Posts |
Posted - 04/25/2007 : 8:11:02 PM
|
Nothing will be done unless we all write and call the elected officials in this city and show our disgust!!!!
THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN
AT-LARGE
Carlo DeMaria
121 Belmont Street
617-381-1130
E-Mail
WARD ONE
Frank Nuzzo, Jr.
20 Evelyn Road
617-387-9082 WARD TWO
Jason Marcus
133 Dartmouth Street
617-381-6327
WARD THREE
Stephen (Stat) Smith
53 Clarence Street
617-387-1984
E-Mail WARD FOUR
L. Charles DiPerri
14 Moody Avenue
617-387-8497
E-Mail
WARD FIVE
Robert Van Campen
14 Harley Avenue
617-387-8468
E-Mail WARD SIX
Joseph W. McGonagle
President
23 Everett Street
617-389-5105
E-Mail
Ward One
Millie
Cardello
27 Ferry Street
617-387-4859
Cell-781-354-4869
E-Mail Michael J.
Mangan
17 Green Street
617-877-0136
E-Mail
Wayne A.
Matewsky
86 Lewis Street
617-389-5106
Ward Two
Joseph R.
King
6 Chatham Road
617-387-3562 Eloy Lou
Sierra
214 Ferry Street
389-4670 Stephen
Simonelli
32 Fremont Avenue
617-387-2068
Ward Three
Sal
DiDomenico
125 Clarence Street
617-387-3327
E-Mail Stephanie V.
Smith
53 Clarence Street
617-389-1717
E-Mail
James A.
Keane
44 Calhoun Avenue
617 389-5043
Ward Four
Bernie D'Onofrio
41 Dunster Road
617 387-9270
Joseph F.
Hickey
20 Raymond Street
617-389-4806
E-Mail John (Leo)
McKinnon
27 Newton Street
617-387-6698
E-Mail
Ward Five
Lorraine "Lorrie"
Bruno
90 Swan Street
617-389-0031
E-Mail
William "Billy"
Cardello
President
56 Dean Street
617-387-5364
E-Mail Rosa
DiFlorio
26 Dyer Avenue
H-617 389-5780
C-617 407-0860
E-Mail
Ward Six
Stephen M.
Faia
51 Linden Street
(617) 381-1509
Catherine
Tomassi Hicks
7 Oakes Street
617- 387-0140
Cynthia
Sarnie
338 Main Street
617 389-1224
E-Mail
Sally |
|
|
|
SolidSnake
Member
70 Posts |
Posted - 04/25/2007 : 10:23:23 PM
|
With all the different people this was sent to I can't believe nothing has been publicized about it unless it is a rehash of stuff already covered by the Court.
Why hasn't Smith or McGonagle raised this issue if it legit--they have both been enemies of the Superintendent for a while.
Kind of mind boggling to me ! |
|
|
|
Ellen
Senior Member
173 Posts |
Posted - 04/25/2007 : 10:27:45 PM
|
| Do you think if someone sent a copy of this letter to Councilor McKinnon he would have it read at the CC meeting? Maybe not, this letter is signed. |
|
|
|
SolidSnake
Member
70 Posts |
 Posted - 04/25/2007 : 11:21:54 PM
|
As I stated before, the Board of Aldermen and the Council should have a rule prohibiting the public reading of UNSIGNED letters.
Until they have such a rule there is the possibility of this incident happening again.
|
|
|
|
Citizen Kane
Advanced Member
1082 Posts |
Posted - 04/25/2007 : 11:48:38 PM
|
It's a sad state we find ourselves in. Has anyone here actually read the audit? Pay close attention to how this document is written. Did anyone notice that there's no signature from an individual at Melanson & Heath? I mean . . . who at that agency actually conducted the audit and was responsible for compiling its contents? The signature pages shows that someone wrote the company name where someone's signature should be. Who is vouching for the quality of this work?
And there's more, but . . . frankly thinking about it is maddening, and it's too late in the evening for me to blather on as I usually do ;-). |
|
|
|
justme
Advanced Member
1428 Posts |
Posted - 04/26/2007 : 05:25:20 AM
|
You're looking for trouble where there isn't any Citizen. It's highly unlikely that there's anything unusual about the signature page. If there was anything questionable about the validity of the audit, it would have been uncovered shortly after Monday's joint convention.
I believe representatives from Melanson & Heath will be present next week to take questions @ the meeting. I can't wait to see who has legitimate (well thought out) questions and who uses the opportunity for self promotion! |
|
|
|
Citizen Kane
Advanced Member
1082 Posts |
Posted - 04/26/2007 : 06:18:32 AM
|
| I disagree, justme. A document of this size and importance should have a signature. This isn't some insurance form letter being sent out to remind you that your premium is coming due. People's livlihoods have been ruined and their reputations brought into question. But, yes there is supposed to be a representative of Melanson at the meeting on Monday. Hopefully our elected officials will ask many questions. |
|
|
|
Citizen Kane
Advanced Member
1082 Posts |
Posted - 04/26/2007 : 06:22:42 AM
|
By the way . . . it isn't just the lack of signature that is troubling to me. In reading through how this document is worded, there are many holes that need to be filled. Another piece that sticks out in my mind is a photo copy of a filing folder tap, on which is typewritten the information for the contents, and down in the right hand corner someone has written "no bid." How do we know who wrote that? Anyone could take a felt tip marker and write that in.
I could be wrong about all of this, and maybe what the Mayor is claiming is legitimate, but given his track record for telling the truth, I'm a little more than skeptical. I simply do not trust these people. |
|
|
|
justme
Advanced Member
1428 Posts |
Posted - 04/26/2007 : 12:14:41 PM
|
I understand that your concerns Citizen and I may have jumped the gun. If Melanson & Heath wasn't going to stand behind it, wouldn't there be a disclaimer of some sort?
Although this audit indicates problems, I have no faith in the people responsible for providing the information. We have no way of knowing if there was any paperwork destroyed or removed from files. It's a shame that I'm thinking that way, but there have been so many lies and misleading statements I just can't help it. |
|
|
|
massdee
Moderator
5299 Posts |
Posted - 04/26/2007 : 3:54:01 PM
|
| Nothing in the Leader Herald about Freddy, either. So far, two for two. |
|
|
|
Been Here to Long
Member
25 Posts |
Posted - 04/26/2007 : 4:55:53 PM
|
| I am amazed to hear there is no signature on this document, which also makes me ask the question is this a truly legal document where so many lives are being affected by this document. |
|
|
|
H1ghCh4r1ty
Advanced Member
967 Posts |
Posted - 04/26/2007 : 10:50:39 PM
|
The audit appears to have been signed by the clerk who typed the cover letter. It was handwritten as the companies name.
That should have been signed by the lead auditor who conducted the investigation and indicated the auditor's title as well..
It was not.
The document does not appear valid and legal.
Emile Schoeffhausen |
|
|
|
massdee
Moderator
5299 Posts |
Posted - 04/26/2007 : 10:54:37 PM
|
| I can see the law suits mounting. Hanlon should not have fired and suspended people until all the facts are in. Just another mistake in his very long list of mistakes. |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
I G Letter
