EverettsPride
Advanced Member
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20016/20016de2204ff6897eed8645a8dbcd8750a7dc66" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20016/20016de2204ff6897eed8645a8dbcd8750a7dc66" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20016/20016de2204ff6897eed8645a8dbcd8750a7dc66" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20016/20016de2204ff6897eed8645a8dbcd8750a7dc66" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20016/20016de2204ff6897eed8645a8dbcd8750a7dc66" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/818d4/818d46df6eec4650c9c17065bcc47b81c3d25a66" alt="" 1140 Posts |
Posted - 04/26/2007 : 10:07:14 AM
|
I saw the following quote on the mirror. It just shows how much Hanlon has cost the taxpayers with the "no new hires".
"That old news of 43 new hires will cost the taxpayers One Million, 290 Thousand Dollars, every year these people are on the payroll, and that figure does not include their benefits. "
Sally
|
|